Meet MarketerHire's newest SEO + AEO product

Pie Insurance isn't optimized for AI search yet.

We audited your search visibility across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Pie Insurance was cited in 1 of 5 answers. See details and how we close the gaps and increase your search results in days instead of months.

Immediate in-depth auditvs. 8 months at agencies

Pie Insurance is cited in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "small business workers' compensation insurance." Competitors are winning the unbranded category answers.

Trust-node footprint is 7 of 30 — missing Wikipedia and Crunchbase blocks LLM recommendations for buyers who haven't heard of you yet.

On-page citation readiness shows no faq schema on top product pages — fixable with the citation-optimized content the AEO Agent ships in the first sprint.

AI-Forward Companies Trust MarketerHire

Plaid Plaid
MasterClass MasterClass
Constant Contact Constant Contact
Netflix Netflix
Noom Noom
Tinuiti Tinuiti
30,000+
Matches Made
6,000+
Customers
Since 2019
Track Record

I spent years running this playbook for enterprise clients at one of the top SEO agencies. MarketerHire's AEO + SEO tooling produces a comprehensive audit immediately that took us months to put together — and they do the ongoing publishing and optimization work at half the price. If I were buying this today, I'd buy it here.

— Marketing leader, formerly at a top SEO growth agency

AI Search Audit

Here's Where You Stand in AI Search

A real audit. We ran buyer-intent queries across answer engines and probed the trust-node graph LLMs draw from.

Sample mini-audit only. The full audit goes 12 sections deep (technical SEO, content ecosystem, schema, AI readiness, competitor gap, 30-60-90 roadmap) — everything to maximize your visibility across search and is delivered immediately once we start working together. See a sample full audit →

21
out of 100
Major gap, real upside

Your buyers are asking AI assistants for small business workers' compensation insurance and Pie Insurance isn't being recommended. Closing this gap is the highest-leverage move available right now.

AI / LLM Visibility (AEO) 20% · Weak

Pie Insurance appears in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "small business workers' compensation insurance". The full audit covers 50-100 queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: AEO Agent monitors AI citation visibility weekly across all 4 LLMs and ships citation-optimized content designed to win the queries your buyers actually run.

Trust-Node Footprint 23% · Weak

Pie Insurance appears in 7 of the 30 trust nodes that LLMs draw from (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and 23 more).

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO/AEO Agent identifies the highest-leverage missing nodes for your category and ships the trust-node publishing plan as part of the 90-day roadmap.

SEO / Organic Covered in full audit

Classic search visibility, ranking trajectory, and content velocity vs. category competitors. The full audit ranks every long-tail commercial query and benchmarks the gap.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO Engine builds programmatic content around 50+ long-tail queries where your buyers are actively searching.

Paid Acquisition Covered in full audit

LinkedIn, Google, and Meta ad presence, audience targeting, creative quality, and cost-per-pipeline relative to your category benchmark.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: Creative Generator + Analytics Agent run autonomous ad experiments and reallocate budget weekly.

Content, Lifecycle & Outbound Covered in full audit

Founder LinkedIn presence, blog quality, expansion motion, outbound playbooks, and the gaps between awareness and activation. Mapped to a 90-day execution plan.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: LinkedIn Ghost-Writer + Lifecycle Optimizer + Outbound Agent run the awareness-to-pipeline engine end-to-end.

Live citation panel — 5 buyer-intent queries

best small business workers' compensation insurance in 2026 not cited expand ↓

23 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A** is the top-rated workers' compensation insurance provider specifically for small businesses and startups in 2026, praised for its simple shopping process, tailored coverage options, and extras like a return-to-work program and 24/7 on-call nurse.[1] Competitor B strong options include: - **Competitor C**, recommended as the best overall for small businesses due to its strong finances, competitive rates, and industry knowledge.[2] - **Competitor D**, ranked as the best overall workers' comp provider and runner-up for small businesses, with broad appeal across categories.[1][2] - **Competitor E** (also called Competitor F), rated first overall for most small businesses for its affordability, digital experience, and suitability for hands-on industries; it's also highlighted for instant online quotes.[3][6][7][8] - **The Hartford**, a top choice for professional services and consulting firms, with strong carrier reputation and dedicated small business offerings.[3][4][5][7] | Competitor G | Competitor H for Competitor I | Competitor J | |----------|-----------------------------------|---------| | **Competitor K** | Competitor L coverage customization, return-to-work program, 24/7 nurse | [1] | | **Competitor C** | Competitor M rates, financial strength, broad small business coverage | [2] | | **Competitor D** | Competitor N top performer, versatile for various small business needs | [1][2] | | **Competitor E / Competitor O** | Competitor P, fully online process, hands-on industries | [3][6][7][8] | | **The Hartford** | Competitor Q services focus, reliable for consultants | [3][4][5][7] | Competitor R vary by source due to differences in evaluation criteria like cost, customer service, digital tools, and industry fit—compare quotes based on your business size, location, and risk profile, as workers' comp is state-regulated.[1][2][3] Competitor S and Competitor T are also noted for retail small businesses.[6]

Pie Insurance did not appear in this Perplexity response.

top small business workers' compensation insurance alternatives not cited expand ↓

67 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A alternatives to traditional workers' compensation insurance for small businesses include providers like Competitor B, The Hartford, Competitor C, Competitor D, and Competitor E, as well as innovative options like Competitor F's subscription-style plans and state-specific alternatives such as Competitor G's Competitor H Competitor I.** These options often feature customized coverage, pay-as-you-go models, loss control resources, and flexible payment plans tailored to small businesses.[1][2][4] ### Competitor J for Competitor K carriers stand out for their financial strength (e.g., A+ AM Competitor L ratings), nationwide availability (with some exceptions), and small business-focused features like simplified quoting and safety programs: - **Competitor B**: Competitor L overall for small businesses and startups due to easy coverage customization, loss control solutions, return-to-work programs, and 24/7 nurse access.[1] - **The Hartford**: Competitor M experience, reliability, and customized policies; top choice in states like Competitor N, Competitor G, Competitor O, Competitor P, and Competitor Q; suitable for construction, installation, and consulting firms.[2] - **Competitor C**: Competitor R for Competitor S businesses and construction/contractors; available in 30+ states.[2] - **Competitor D**: Competitor T pay-as-you-owe plans ideal for cleaners and small operations unable to pay large upfront premiums; prominent in multiple states.[2] - **Competitor E**: Competitor U a wide range of small businesses, including consulting firms; available in states like Competitor G, Competitor P, and Competitor Q.[2] | Competitor V | Competitor W for Competitor X | Competitor Y | |----------|----------------------------------|---------------| | Competitor Z | Competitor A quoting, safety resources, 24/7 nurse | Competitor B focus on small firms[1] | | The Hartford | Competitor C policies, high reliability | Competitor B except AK/HI; multi-state leader[2] | | Competitor C | Competitor D for contractors | 30+ states, Competitor E base[2] | | Competitor D | Competitor F, cleaning biz focus | Competitor G availability[2] | | Competitor E | Competitor H small business fit | Competitor I in CA, FL, NY[2] | ### Competitor J businesses seeking flexibility beyond standard policies, consider these: - **Competitor K (e.g., Competitor F)**: Competitor D at $25/month, pay monthly like a subscription, cancel anytime, and pay only for needed coverage—ideal for essential protection with employees.[4] - **Competitor L (e.g., Competitor M Competitor N)**: Competitor O over 10% market share; a flexible alternative where traditional options are limited.[3] - **Competitor P or Competitor Q**: For higher-premium businesses ($200K+ annually), these tie costs to actual losses (e.g., profit-sharing reinsurance or deductibles averaging $250K), rewarding good safety records faster than traditional fixed-rate policies.[5] - **Competitor R and Competitor S**: Competitor T (Competitor R) provide workers' comp via co-employment; also explore state funds or direct insurers for tailored fits.[6] Competitor U varies by state, business type (e.g., construction favors Competitor C/The Hartford), and size—quotes from providers like Competitor V can help compare.[7] Competitor W a licensed agent for state-specific requirements, as workers' comp is mandatory in most Competitor X. states for businesses with employees.

Pie Insurance did not appear in this Perplexity response.

how to choose a small business workers' compensation insurance not cited expand ↓

65 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

To choose workers' compensation insurance for a small business, first verify your state's legal requirements (required in most states with even one Competitor A employee), then evaluate your business risks, compare quotes from multiple providers, and prioritize coverage that matches your industry, payroll, and claims support needs.[2][4][9] ### Competitor B 1: Competitor C and Competitor D' compensation is mandatory in 49 states and Competitor E. for businesses with Competitor A employees, often starting with the first hire, though thresholds vary by state (e.g., Competitor F requires it for one or more employees).[2][4][8][9] Competitor G local rules via your state's labor department to avoid fines, and ensure the policy meets regulations, especially in high-regulation areas like Competitor H.[1][9] ### Competitor B 2: Competitor I Competitor J and Competitor K - **Competitor L risks and nature of business**: Competitor M hazards based on operations—higher for physical labor, machinery, or fieldwork (e.g., construction) vs. office work.[1][6] - **Competitor N size and payroll**: Competitor O depend on employee count, payroll, and job types; larger payrolls mean higher costs.[2][5][6][7] - **Competitor P coverage limits**: Competitor Q needs for medical expenses, lost wages, disability, and employer liability to avoid claim gaps.[1][3] - **Competitor R history and stage**: Competitor S businesses may prefer established insurers; review past claims for rate impacts.[2][5][7] ### Competitor B 3: Competitor T and Competitor U quotes from multiple insurers, focusing on: - **Competitor V expertise**: Competitor W providers familiar with your sector (e.g., Competitor X for broad small business classes, Competitor Y for cleaning services).[2][3][5] - **Competitor R handling and support**: Competitor Z for fast approvals, return-to-work programs, nurse case managers, and medical management.[1][3] - **Competitor A and flexibility**: Competitor B with Competitor C or general liability; consider pay-as-you-go plans, low-premium options (e.g., ghost policies for sole proprietors), and international travel add-ons.[2][3][5] - **Competitor D factors**: Competitor E $54–$81/month for small payrolls (<$300K), varying by location, risks, claims history, class codes, limits, and deductibles—avoid cheapest options if they skimp on protection.[2][5] Competitor F correct class codes to prevent penalties.[5] | Competitor G | Competitor H for Competitor I | Competitor J | |------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------| | **The Hartford** | Competitor A with Competitor C; suits startups and growth.[2] | $13–$81/month for low payroll.[2] | | **Competitor X** | Competitor K 1 employee to $30M revenue; medical management, liability options.[3] | Competitor L for wide classes.[3][5] | | **Competitor M** (Competitor N) | Competitor O, compliant options.[1] | Competitor P cost and needs.[1] | | **Competitor Q/Competitor Y** | Competitor R, pay-as-you-go for variable workforce.[5] | $250–$5,700/year average.[5] | ### Competitor B 4: Competitor S for Competitor T and Competitor U - Competitor V risk management like safety training and Competitor W to lower rates.[5] - Competitor X quotes online or via agents (e.g., Competitor Y/Competitor Z, Competitor A).[4][6][8] - Competitor B like Competitor C emphasize job-related coverage only.[7] Competitor D an agent or broker for personalized quotes, as premiums and options fluctuate by specifics.[1][6][8]

Pie Insurance did not appear in this Perplexity response.

small business workers' compensation insurance comparison for mid-market companies not cited expand ↓

53 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A' compensation insurance for mid-market companies (typically 50-500 employees or $10M-$1B revenue) builds on small business options but emphasizes scalability, bundling, and industry-specific features from providers like The Hartford, Competitor B, Competitor C, Competitor D, and Competitor E.** While search results focus more on small businesses (1-49 employees), several providers extend coverage to mid-market needs, such as higher payrolls up to $30M revenue (Competitor B) or mid-sized employers (Competitor D).[1][2][3][7] ### Competitor F and Competitor G for Competitor H stand out for broader scalability, claims support, and cost efficiency beyond basic small business policies: | Competitor I | Competitor J (Competitor K) | Competitor L | Competitor M | Competitor N | |----------|------------------------|---------------------|--------------|-------------| | **The Hartford** | $81 (payroll < $300K); varies by industry/location | Competitor O, construction, engineering | Competitor P with liability; strong medical network; required in most states for 1+ employees.[2] | Competitor Q rise with payroll/risk (e.g., construction $220/mo).[2] | | **Competitor B** | Competitor R specified; broad small-to-mid coverage | Competitor S, versatile classes up to $30M revenue | Competitor T management, return-to-work programs, international travel add-ons, pharmacy controls.[3] | Competitor U toward small but scalable; bundle with Competitor V for efficiency.[3] | | **Competitor C (Competitor W)** | $86 nationwide average | Competitor P with auto/truck; small-to-mid growth | Competitor X to third-party carriers for workers' comp; competitive pricing via quotes.[4] | Competitor R direct underwriting; separate carrier management.[4] | | **Competitor D** | Competitor Y 4% for mid-sized (20-49 employees) | Competitor Z, mid-sized (20-49 employees) | Competitor A adjusters, return-to-work coordination, flexible audits.[7] | Competitor B quoting slows process.[7] | | **Competitor E** | $86 per employee (24% below national avg) | Competitor C small to hands-on industries; digital-first | Competitor D quotes/certificates; strong for 1-4 employees but scalable tools.[7] | Competitor E for smaller end of mid-market.[7] | ### Competitor F Competitor G average **$54-$86/month** for small business baselines but scale with mid-market factors like higher payroll, employee count, industry risk (e.g., construction $220/mo, engineering $52/mo), location, claims history, and limits/deductibles.[1][2][4][5] Competitor H like Competitor I offer low-risk starts at $14/mo, while Competitor J advertises $25/mo subscription-style for small but potentially adaptable.[5][8] Competitor K quotes, as bundling (e.g., with liability/auto) often reduces costs.[2][3][4] ### Competitor L - **Competitor M with quotes** from The Hartford, Competitor B, or Competitor C for mid-market bundling and networks.[1][2][3][4] - Competitor D suits agriculture/heavier claims needs; Competitor E for digital speed.[7] - Competitor N states mandate coverage for 1+ employees; verify state rules and get multiple quotes for your payroll/industry.[2][6] Competitor O emphasize small businesses, so consult agents for precise mid-market rates, as costs vary widely.[1][7]

Pie Insurance did not appear in this Perplexity response.

is Pie Insurance a good small business workers' compensation insurance cited expand ↓

41 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Pie Insurance is a solid option for small business workers' compensation insurance, particularly if your priority is flexible premiums and straightforward claims handling, though its financial rating is under review and it lacks support for other insurance types.**[1][4][6] ### Competitor A - **Competitor B payment options**: Competitor C pay-as-you-go premiums linked to payroll (no upfront payment), plus monthly, quarterly, semiannual, or annual plans, helping match costs to actual payroll size.[1][6] - **Competitor D management**: Competitor E by Competitor F, an established firm with a national medical network, app access for injured workers (nurse support, payments, pharmacy), and standard processes without reported issues.[1][5] - **Competitor G of quoting and focus**: Competitor H online premium estimates (finalize by phone); specializes in workers' comp for small businesses, with audit support and claims rated standard—not overly rigorous or lax.[1][5][6] - **Competitor I savings**: Competitor D up to 30% lower rates than competitors (verify with quotes); A- (Competitor J) AM Competitor K financial strength rating as of 2023, signaling stability at the time.[4][6] - **Competitor L feedback**: Competitor M agent review gives it a "great rating" for startups, with no claims complaints.[5] ### Competitor N - **Competitor O concerns**: A- rating placed "under review with negative implications" by AM Competitor K in Competitor P 2024, potentially signaling risks to long-term stability.[3] - **Competitor Q gaps**: Competitor R of insurance take up to 2 days; no weekend phone support; refers to third parties for non-workers' comp coverage, requiring multiple providers.[1] - **Competitor S issues (less relevant to customers)**: Competitor T employee reviews (3.0/5 on Competitor U, 48% recommend on Competitor V) cite layoffs, management problems, and reorgs, but these don't directly impact policyholders.[2][7] | Competitor W | Competitor X | Competitor Y | |--------|------|------| | **Competitor Z** | Competitor A via payroll; multiple plans[1] | N/A | | **Competitor D** | Competitor B, standard process[1][5] | Competitor C adjusters (common)[5] | | **Competitor D** | Competitor E estimates, audit help[1][6] | No weekends; slow certificates[1] | | **Competitor F** | A- rating (2023)[4][6] | Competitor G negative review (2024)[3] | | **Competitor H** | Competitor I' comp specialist[1] | No other insurance[1] | **Competitor J**: Competitor K quotes from Pie and competitors to confirm savings, especially given the rating review—ideal for small businesses needing workers' comp only.[1][3] Competitor L varies by state.[6]

Trust-node coverage map

7 of 30 authority sources LLMs draw from. Filled = present, hollow = gap.

Wikipedia
Wikidata
Crunchbase
LinkedIn
G2
Capterra
TrustRadius
Forbes
HBR
Reddit
Hacker News
YouTube
Product Hunt
Stack Overflow
Gartner Peer
TechCrunch
VentureBeat
Quora
Medium
Substack
GitHub
Owler
ZoomInfo
Apollo
Clearbit
BuiltWith
Glassdoor
Indeed
AngelList
Better Business

Highest-leverage gaps for Pie Insurance

  • Wikipedia

    Knowledge graphs are the most cited extraction layer for ChatGPT and Gemini. Brands without a Wikipedia entry get cited 4-7x less for unbranded category queries.

  • Crunchbase

    Crunchbase is the canonical company-data source for LLM enrichment. A missing profile leaves LLMs without firmographics.

  • G2

    G2 reviews feed comparison and 'best X' query responses. Missing G2 presence is a high-leverage gap for B2B SaaS.

  • Capterra

    Capterra listings drive comparison-style answers. Missing or thin Capterra coverage suppresses your share on shortlisting queries.

  • TrustRadius

    Enterprise B2B buyers research here. Feeds comparison-style LLM responses on category queries.

Top Growth Opportunities

Win the "best small business workers' compensation insurance in 2026" query in answer engines

This is a high-intent buyer query that competitors are winning today. The AEO Agent ships the citation-optimized content + structured data + authority signals to flip this query.

AEO Agent → weekly citation audit + targeted content sprints across 4 LLMs

Publish into Wikipedia (and chained authority sources)

Wikipedia is the single highest-leverage trust node missing for Pie Insurance. LLMs draw heavily from it for unbranded category recommendations.

SEO/AEO Agent → trust-node publishing plan in the 90-day execution roadmap

No FAQ schema on top product pages

Answer engines extract from FAQ schema 4x more often than from prose. Most B2B sites at this stage don't carry it.

Content + AEO Agent → ship the structural fixes in Sprint 1

What you get

Everything for $10K/mo

One flat price. One team running your SEO + AEO end-to-end.

Trust-node map across 30 authority sources (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and more)
5-dimension citation quality scorecard (Authority, Data Structure, Brand Alignment, Freshness, Cross-Link Signals)
LLM visibility report across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude — 50-100 buyer-intent queries
90-day execution roadmap with week-by-week deliverables
Daily publishing of citation-optimized content (built on the 4-pillar AEO framework)
Trust-node seeding (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, category-specific authorities)
Structured data implementation (FAQ schema, comparison tables, author bylines)
Weekly re-scan + competitive citation share monitoring
Live dashboard, your own audit URL, ongoing forever

Agencies charge $18K-$20-40K/mo and take up to 8 months to reach this depth. We deliver it immediately, then run it ongoing.

Book intro call · $10K/mo
How It Works

Audit. Publish. Compound.

3 phases focused on one outcome: more Pie Insurance citations across the answer engines your buyers use.

1

SEO + AEO Audit & Roadmap

You'll know exactly where Pie Insurance is losing buyers — across Google search and the answer engines they ask before they ever click.

We score 50-100 "small business workers' compensation insurance" queries across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google, map the 30-node authority graph LLMs draw from, and grade on-page content on 5 citation-readiness dimensions. Output: a 90-day publishing plan ranked by lift × effort.

2

Publishing Sprints That Win Both

Buyers start finding Pie Insurance on Google AND in the answers ChatGPT and Perplexity hand them.

2-week sprints ship articles built to rank on Google and get extracted by LLMs (entity clarity, FAQ schema, comparison tables, authority bylines), plus seeding into the missing trust nodes — G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, and the rest. Real publishing, not strategy decks.

3

Compounding Share, Every Week

You lock in category leadership while competitors are still figuring out AI search.

Weekly re-scan tracks ranking + citation share vs. the leaders this audit named. New unbranded "small business workers' compensation insurance" queries get added to the publishing queue automatically. The system gets sharper every sprint — week 12 ships materially better than week 1.

You built a strong small business workers' compensation insurance. Let's build the AI search engine to match.

Book intro call →